The End of the World as we
Misperceive it
by PSI TECH President, Remote Viewer Joni Dourif
You've heard the predictions prophesying the end times, why even a certain Remote Viewer spreads themes of coming gloom. "Cataclysmic times right around the corner" yet as we pass those corners by, we can't help but notice that we're still here! What the heck is happening and why do so many folks invest in the fruition of doomsday predictions? It causes one to wonder, do we humans want a huge catastrophe to happen?
It may seem even more confusing to those who don't know very much about remote viewing and equate its veracity with the prophesizing wake. Remember, in the big scheme, there are still only a few of us; remote viewers who experience the technology's' proof on a daily basis. We loose sight that to many, we might appear like a "cult of new age kooks" then to make matters worse, we readily admit that we use to be called "spooks." Yes indeed! Our origin was classified "Top Secret" and the DoD (Department of Defense) spent millions to produce their psychic spies. I'm not sure if our history helps now, I've heard the rationale; "If the military spent money on it then it must be real." A similar rationale for the end times I've heard is; "So many prophets and books of note, including bible stories, spin tales of coming doom. How can they ALL be wrong? The End must be near."
Our countless unfolding futures that threaten our species survival might cause one to wonder if we're not really, collectively, crying out for a renewal. To renewal of what is the question here. So many folks seem lost in their search for answers; some believe too easily while others abandon all possibility. It's the successful seeker who remains open yet determined and skeptical. If this explorer is willing to weed through the chatter he can uproot the seeds of truth that created much of the clamor. However the flood of misportrayals can easily sweep one away. It's not an easy feat to sift through the many fluctuations that our imaginations create. Here in lies the problem for those who don't learn this skill; they have no method to separate out their own imaginations from what they truly know is real. This lack in human perspective must be addressed on an individual basis before attempting to assess what is lacking in the masses.
When populations grow fearful I am flooded with the question asking if I support remote viewing doomsday predictions. I have avoided answering this inquiry (until now) because it requires an explanation that is not a simple yes or no rebuttal.
So, here's the set up: Unless you have been under water you cannot truly understand the feeling to describe it. It's the same problem we, remote viewers, have trying to explain traveling through a timeless space in order to interpret time. Have you ever tried to hold completely still underwater? Pin pointing events in the fluidity of the future is not much different. I don't like predicting coming events because unless you are an experienced Remote Viewer, you cannot really comprehend the existing conflict of paradigms that we continually maneuver. If I just spewed out predictions, I would be no different than the ordinary sooth sayer, prophet or card reader.
I teach Remote Viewing so that those who really want to know can have the opportunity to do so. However, Remote Viewing is a skill that one must keep learning, beginning with the tangibles, like mountains and structures then progressing to the intangibles, such as concepts, thoughts and ideas. It's like learning a foreign language; it doesn't take that long to learn but in order to speak fluently it takes practice, experience and discipline.
Once a remote viewer is proficient though the language analogy doesn't suffice for there aren't enough words in our language to describe the broad expansion of perceptual sight. The Remote Viewing protocols that we install in training turn what we use to experience as only a random ability (ie. intuition) into a scientifically repeatable skill (i.e remote viewing). Our technology is only 20 years young so our language is still evolving. As we plunder through unknown lands we ad to our vocabulary to identify new spaces. As we expose ourselves to new-ness our perceptions are increased. Every time we remote view a new target, we learn more about ourselves and we learn how to filter out and recognize what data is real and what is just our imagination. Subsequently we develop a new internal system that sifts everything else we perceive in life as well. It's a passive process of personal evolution (that Carl Jung calls "integration") which has become a by-product side-effect of remote viewing new targets.
However, as we trek through future times we find ourselves in a bind for there is no way to impose our measuring system of time in the broad and vast timeless space of the Matrix. Our futures are dynamic and organized by events. Our traditional clocks in a timeless world seem to make no sense. What part of the predictions are real and what parts of them are folly? It would be valuable for you to understand first, the systems we use to gather the data. I often resort to metaphors to describe what remote viewing through time is like for us. The ideological images seem to help to clarify the ambiguities that we encounter which are too complex to directly explain.
A Metaphor for Measuring Time
You are on your trek, and you see the mountain up ahead, but because of its huge enormity, you cannot accurately judge how far away you are from it. You hike along the path and as you draw closer, you note that the mountain appears larger, but you still cannot judge exactly how far away it is. You realize that in order to measure the remaining length, you'll need to see further up ahead, beyond your physical sight. So, you pull out your handy telescope to see what's out there along your way. You can see details up close through your telescope but it's difficult to ascertain any one thing against the back drop of its homogenous terrain. You zoom out and zoom in again and again until you realize that it's a more realistic perspective you need to acquire your accurate travel time. You devise a measuring method that requires you to find unique features ahead. These will serve as markers to separate your pathway into sections so that you can recognize your position. This is how you dice your distance and measure your map as you guesstimate how much time will lapse before you arrive at your mountain base that feels so close yet seems so far away.
Now, imagine that you are the hiker and the path is your life. The markers are unusual events that you will experience, in time. The mountain is the juncture, an event that everyone can sense, and the telescope is your skill of remote viewing that you have learned.
An essential key to finding clarity in this perceptual puzzle is the ability to differentiate between what is external and what is internal. Emotionally driven events stand out as obvious markers in time but remote viewers must be able to distinguish emotionally driven events from catastrophic events where emotions also run high. The emotionally driven event is most often a personal circumstance that intertwines with the future of the remote viewer. It can also involve a community of people (like a tragic death) that influences the Remote Viewers future as well as many others. A common mistake that remote viewers make is to magnify the emotionally driven event (that influences them in the future) and misinterpret its effect on the overall populous. When one is still bilocated or emotionally influenced, it's easy to jump to conclusions and assume that a target is a catastrophic event when it's really just a lot of upset emotions. This is how a real event can be exaggerated into a catastrophic prediction when in reality, it was not a false fact but instead an over-dramatized rendition of an event that when its time came, its effect was much less significant. It was not really a huge spike in the matrix up ahead but only a unique marker; a detail that stood out along the way. One of the ways to prevent this mishap is to allow enough time to pass after ending a remote viewing session and before attempting to analyze the data. A more common pitfall however is one that goes unrecognized; the lack of self perspective; which is not being able to identify what emotions at the target event are yours in the future or yours in the current time. You can see how time travel requires a more refined instrument to accurately predict the future. The Remote Viewer must be a person who is introspective and emotionally integrated enough to remain detached and objective in order to process their own emotional agenda in a highly emotional event. This is how our hiker can misinterpret his distance to the mountain by zooming in with his telescope too often without zooming out enough to keep his own perspective.
Unique features are easy for us to spot because like the entire fin in the seas and all of our four legged and winged animal kin; human beings are creatures who are instinctively attracted to novelty. We can't help but notice what's different and unique and the more unique it is, the more we notice, unless of course it is so different that it exists completely outside of our conscious thesaurus (but that's another article).
Quite literally, much of what we perceive accurately depends on how much we are able to interpret in our own personal reality. If our own interpersonal system is lacking than how can we expect to interpret another accurately. I often wonder if the mountain itself attracts people who need the dramatic enormity to find purpose and feel unique in their own lives. In reality, if the mountain serves to define the hikers' view of himself, then his identity and the mountain itself, have already been misinterpreted.
A future catastrophic event is a target that is hard to miss just like seeing the mountain up ahead. However, measuring its occurrence to pinpoint its time in space is an experiential dilemma that only few can trace. Human beings must be able to manage their own emotional landscape before they can expect to identify their collective and individual future fates. The more we remote view the more we learn about ourselves and the more we learn about ourselves, the more clearly we can perceive our future.
The key to survival is evolution as we can't see the mountain accurately until we develop new eyesight.
Visit Joni's webpage and read more articles by Joni at: http://www.jonidourif.com
A rare TRV training opportunity with Joni is now available. To read more, click here!
<< Return to Index
